“This is a NEGLIGEE! Rebekah Vardy explosion Kim Kardashian in the” corset “dressed in four-year-old daughter North

Earlier this week, Kim Kardashian wore a corset, wearing a four-year-old daughter north, causing anger.

Now Rebekah Vardy has joined the war, in order to encourage her little girl wearing a “satin negligence”, exploded the reality of the star.

This is a saturress with a fake corset ragged, why would he wear the 4-year-old daughter? Recently he and her football player Jamie Vardy (Jamie Vardy) together to welcome her The second child of Ripa on Twitter raging.

She said: “I have never been used to judge other people’s parenting options, but cheap wholesale corsets is not it?

When North was found through New York’s illegal clothes, all the social media was broken.

So Venus on Wednesday to defend himself, insisted: “I will never put my daughter in the corset!”

“Relax is the one I bought for a dress, which is a cotton fabric, dressed, looks like a corset! Just decorate.

Uploading the film about the clothes, she continued, “I did not design this dress, actually bought, it was not a corset, just fabric in front.

“So I think it ‘s really cute, I bought it from a designer, just the fabric, it’ s not a real corset.

But some of her followers did not do so, one insisted that the material itself is not suitable for a little girl.

Of course, Kim is not familiar with the corset itself.

In addition to the use of tight-fitting corset waist training, you can also use old-fashioned clothing to stratify her clothes.

New season, new design – Sexybvds proudly introduced 2013 new sexy underwear and Halloween costumes

Sexybvds, a well-known sexy lingerie and garment manufacturer and distributor, proudly announced the launch of the new Halloween and Christmas season from pop designers.

Sexybvds is a professional manufacturer and wholesaler of wholesale corsets sexy lingerie for nearly eight years and has thousands of customers from all over the world. Sexybvds offers a wide range of commercial sites, including traditional lingerie stores and boutiques, retail stores, discounts and flea market type outlets, family gatherings, EBayers, and mass distributors. A variety of sexy underwear can be in their stock, such as:

Sexy dress, corset, club dress, leggings, baby pajamas, bikini suits, sexy ladies underwear, men’s underwear, sexy suits, porn dresses, sexy stockings and sexy leather series.

“We just want to help our retail customers build a successful business.” Sexybvds spokesman Li Lanqing said. “We have enabled our customers to keep this trend, and in fact, even before other sexy lingerie wholesale companies or even fashion shows, we have also introduced new products to our customers to provide our customers with a competitive advantage.”

With the popularity of Halloween and Christmas, young people gradually increase, Sexybvds knows that their fanatical loyal customer fan team hopes for a new exciting look, which will help them out of the other parties and cause the most attention. To meet this need, Sexybvds is pleased to be able to offer more sexy lingerie and clothing than any other sexy lingerie dealer online. These new and exciting Halloween and Christmas costumes, plus more than 3000 other sexy lingerie, make Sexybvds a female, group and couple find sexy underwear and clothing that will make 2013 the best ever Halloween and Christmas The best place.

E-commerce is on the rise while SexyBvds is one of the biggest online wholesalers on the network with sexy underwear, sexy Halloween and Christmas costumes, cheap corsets, swimsuit and club dresses. Sexybvds was founded in 2006 with more than 3,000 products at wholesale prices. Sexybvds in the wholesale underwear market to provide the best quality products, has become a leader in e-commerce. In addition, Sexybvds’ customer service team is unparalleled. Please note that with the help of the operator, if there is a problem or problem, Sexybvds’ customer service team is always willing and able to assist.

Corset and Wines: Coordinated Secret Gifts and Secret Sales Secrets of Modern Art

The secret modern art doesctrine represents one of the more complex and conflicting areas of American patent law. In 1946, when the metallization project was decided and accelerated by Hobbes v. United States, the court had an impact on the effectiveness of sales, gifts, knowledge, public use, private use, advertising and sales patents in different ways, each Are dependent on a series of changes, often a common series of factors, most of which is the US Patent and Trademark Office in the review of patent applications can not be assessed. The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and many patent attorneys agree that 35 U.S.C.’s new US Invention Act (AIA) Article 102 aims to completely eliminate the secret prior art. However, the court may also use the language as an opportunity to coordinate the field.

The secret principles of the existing technology are rooted in important policy considerations: the inventor may keep the invention as a trade secret for long-term retention, and only when the competitor begins to uncover the secret to get the invention quickly, thus greatly extending the effective grant patent. In order to avoid this result, the United States Former US No. 35 §102 provides that “[a] an individual is entitled to a patent unless the invention [b] is publicly used or sold in Date of application more than one year before the patent.

At the turn of the century, and explaining similar language, the Supreme Court considered the notorious case of the tights, Egbert v. Lippmann. An inventor gave a woman who later became his wife a new set of corsets or steel. Eight years later, he invited a friend to study the invention, so his wife “out, with a pair of corsets and a pair of scissors back, these corsets torn open, and out. ] Then explained how they were made and used. “Ten years later, the inventor applied for a patent.

The court has made a decision on the secret matter whether the sale, the gift, the knowledge or the use of the disclosure involves: “the inventor, giving or selling his equipment to another, being used by the insured or the defendant, unrestricted or Limited, or confidential, and so used, this use is public, even if the use and use of knowledge may be limited to one person.

The separation of the way from the thousands of years after the metalworking (metal 2) gift, disclosure and use of the case, the case of the appeal, elaborated on the basic facts (metallization 1). The inventors have discovered a new method of roughening a hard metal surface so that additional metal can be more closely integrated so that the mechanic can reconstruct the worn engine parts. In the first thirty months of applying for a patent, “he solicited the advice of a friendly engineer, who told him to thoroughly test the patent before the actual service.” In the first 29 months of the submission, the inventor commissioned Patent search. Twenty-three months before the submission, the inventor advertised in a trade magazine, announcing that he had a new hardened metallization process, despite no notice. The inventor also made a statement to the Executive Officer who provided him with a patent for the inventor and granted a patent license. “After thirty to twelve months, the inventor solicited and received sixty-six orders for the reconstruction of the part,” the practice of this process is so guarded, not openly aware; its nature is only to the employees of a few inventors and Consultants disclose that in all cases, in the case of distrust, not being abused. “The amount of uncertainty in the work is done at the expense of the inventor, and the other sales are the parties who know the” secret process. “An order for the first eight months of the patent application is to understand that the job is Experimental customer carried out.

Rely on Egbert, the Metallic Court 1 decided that the above sale and use were not open and therefore not a condition of patentability. “The inventor’s patent is the condition that, after preparing for the patent, he will not use his findings competitively; he must be in his own secret or” Legal monopoly. “However, for subsequent doctrinal consistency, the court has never determined which activities produced a patentable column. Perhaps the event that is defined is the discussion with the engineer or the ad. Perhaps this bar is triggered by the genius part, and perhaps only those who lead to the use of the inventor secret sales before getting the patent to get “competitive advantage over others”, although the metal 1 did not find out which sales might be, Did not provide factors to determine the competitive advantage.

Thirty years later, Hobbes v. American clarified that the general sale – regardless of purpose, confidentiality or the identity of the seller – produced 35U.SC Section 102 “Sale” patentable column, as long as the equipment was fully developed, patents and experiments The use has ended. However, it is determined whether the contract is and when to invent the “sale”, whether the inquiry or order is counted as sales, and whether the use of the experiment is over, and even in Hobbes there is no quick task.

The complexity soon hung up. Considering a few related doctrines, all of these are legally applicable laws: the sale itself may be experimental use, thus exempting Section 102 “sell” the patentability clause; the sale rights do not make the equipment “sold”; between legal entities The seller and the end user do not need to know or agree to sell; if no sample is provided to the customer, the entity may be in the presence of the product, and the seller may not be required to sell the goods; The “temporary” model presented to potential buyers may hinder patentability unless the details of the invention of the potential buyer are described as unsuitable prior to the sale of the agreement; similarly, the disposition of the origin of the income may No; the list of prices is sufficient to be invented; third-party experimental use may trigger a fatal bar, except under the supervision and control of the patent applicant.

Doctrine multiplication has a side effect: an independent inventor who seeks an investor or an independent inventor before seeking an investor or a client – itself is an increasingly expensive sport – is likely to be in conflict with at least one “sale” exception. Complex inventors and large innovative entities are better able to navigate these deceptive waters, and the courts must deal with strong de facto cases of specific sales and scattered in a better part of the century.

Perhaps the United States Invention Act amended 35U.S.C.102, now states that “an individual is entitled to a patent unless the claimed invention is publicly available, sold or otherwise made available to the public”. According to many read, “or other available for public” language modified the “use” and “selling” terms, the ability to eliminate the secret prior art, the formation of patent licensing. It remains to be seen whether the court will take such an analysis, since the patent submitted under the United States Invention Act is usually not yet released, let alone questioned in court.

However, in addition to the secret prioritized wholesale classification of the existing technology, if the “public use” is read into the “use” and “sales” terms, you can choose a wholesale corsets choice: sales can simply be used with the current processing, gifts, and other disclosures The Article 102 of the Pre-Trial Law has been required, and the public can access the case for non-economic purposes (such as gifts or demonstrations) that meet the conditions of public use. Full secrets may prevent gifts, disclosures and use of the “pre-emptive rights” Article 102 “Public Use” column, just as the lack of safety makes the corset steel available to the public. In fact, the Federal Circuit may have been in this direction to the controversial “sale” situation.

At the Delano farm, after deciding on AIA, but explaining the patent application before the AIA and applying the former AIA law, the third party gets under the control of improved grape varieties under oral confidentiality conditions. However, the third party then handed the grape plant to the other two grape growers within four years. They all knew that the improved grapes were the main competitive advantage, all of which were planted on hundreds of places visible on public roads plant.

By most of the measures, if any of these transfers or activities are offered for sale, then they will make these plants not affected under the metallization. There is evidence that, as the lower court has pointed out, one of the third parties sold the other grapes and served as mentors and exchanged “grafts” between the two sides. The two sides may exchange the social or non-monetary benefits of the plant and may allocate plants to each other to understand the future sale of grapes. Test briefings and complaints vary, claiming that a third party has grafted grapes during normal business, and the patent is not valid under 35 U. S. C. Article 102 (b) – although it does not specify whether the plaintiff wishes to apply the “public use” or “sale” bar. If the harvest is good, as long as the conditional offer to sell grapes, and perhaps a few samples of grapes together, should be enough to quote.

But the gift is essentially selling the problem has not been resolved. On the contrary, the Federal Circuit in the “public use” principle to determine the problem, the application of “full secret” test is very reminiscent of Egbert and its descendants. The court cited factors such as the inability to identify grape varieties by simply looking at grapes, compared to the size of the site, the limited number of sown areas, the unqualified cultivation, and the fact that no other person recognized the evidence to test the breed, especially the third party Rattan test is confidential.

In function, the back of the AIA $ 102 ‘[open] sale of the bar’s application may look much like the Delano farm. The decision of the court will depend on whether the sale or offer is “publicly sold” – that is, the party that does not have sufficient confidentiality obligations and whether there is a public use. Under this system, a backyard inventor does not need to pass several rigorous restrictions on the sale of samples to find his patent invalid: at least if these secret sales did not cause new art, reverse engineering or more than one year before the public application patent application The Like secret use, secret sales may become publicly sold in the case of too much distribution.

It is important that, for the courts that hear such cases, records will be a public issue and a measure taken by the Parties for confidentiality. The court may turn to decide what kind of “restricted or restricted or confidential ban” is sufficient to prevent sales from becoming “provided to the public” rather than sorting old sales receipts and oral testimony.

Finally, the Delano farm should provide a pacification solution to the courts that are plagued by the potential impact of the US Department of Defense 35 U.C.C. Section 102 – Review of gifts based on more reasonable “public access” criteria, rather than metallized sales rules, did not lead to any terrible march. At least should provide and sell similar reviews should be worse.

So you can feel sexy and still pay student loans to affordable underwear

I like dress up, I like lace, I like to watch a special night. But unfortunately, the bill still exists. Recently,  I noticed that most underwear seems to be for the rich, because for me, the rich means that you have all the money, in addition to groceries and rents, you have to spend money.

Note that it makes me pursue cheap sexy corsets, which is actually affordable, which makes me straightforward and affordable and affordable whole: Amazon. While I am a little disappointed about the lack of goods like those who like the buttocks, but I still find some cute works that I may even invest for myself, you know, research and all.

In any case, I gathered them here to prevent you from trying to see. happy shopping!

Varsbaby pushed on embroidery bra

If you like me pinch your wallet string, you might be thinking about how $ 30 can also make you a lot of lovely tops that you can wear in public places This may be my most important about the purchase of underwear for their own pendant. But taking into account the fact that in this case, $ 30 can make you three in the collection. Not only will you get a bra and underwear, but you also get a matching garter. So when you think of it, $ 10 per piece is actually affordable underwear.

This is basically the whole package and cabo odle to get your character, maybe you can even mix mix when you expand your collection online.

XAKALAKA Plus size Baby Doll underwear dress

I like this lovely, clumsy, super women’s nightlife. The front of the silky pink panel gives you the support of the body, leaving your imagination, and the pure behind is perfect so that your lace does not pass.

As a bonus, it’s designed to fit your sweetness without increasing costs! I hate it when the underwear makes it seem that only very thin people are making love. More work for all – i mean all of us, please!

Avidlove sexy lace harness mini Cami underwear pajamas


Wait, is this a shorts and a tank’s top sleep suit? Either way, I like the material to fit the shape of the body. In addition, this piece has four different colors, so if it applies to you, you are basically set forever.

To be honest, this work is very cute, I think I may just sleep and sleep, no matter that night no one sleep.

Avidlove Babydoll Chemise

This soft blue is so bright, soft knee hem is super charming, waist bow adds a good little accent. As an added benefit, it looks like the bust to fit the size of the range, so you will not try to squeeze a baby that actually makes a doll for your head.

And as a lady of love lady, I can personally say that this small number will make me blush. Everyone needs a strange vote of confidence, right?

AKAUFENG sleeveless fur corset

I just assume that every woman and woman’s life for some time, she said: “Yes, today is my day to buy leather corset,” I tell the truth, I have not arrived, this is a bit scary me. But fear is to turn on the lights, right?

In addition, this work fascinated me. It is no cup-like, which may release your slot machine bounce, if the product description is believed, its design also through the “avoid friction” to keep your skin “healthy”. Whether there is a corset caused by the carpet burns popular I do not know what i do not know but i need to find out!

Anyway, once you enter a market, 20 counter glasses seem to be a perfectly reasonable price adjustable leather corset. In addition, harnesses even fit your size!
Google Translate for Business:Translator ToolkitWebsite Translator

Corset and Wines: Coordinated Secret Gifts and Secret Sales Secrets of Modern Art

The secret modern art doesctrine represents one of the more complex and conflicting areas of American patent law. In 1946, wholesale corsets when the metallization project was decided and accelerated by Hobbes v. United States, the court had an impact on the effectiveness of sales, gifts, knowledge, public use, private use, advertising and sales patents in different ways, each Are dependent on a series of changes, often a common series of factors, most of which is the US Patent and Trademark Office in the review of patent applications can not be assessed. The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and many patent attorneys agree that 35 U.S.C.’s new US Invention Act (AIA) Article 102 aims to completely eliminate the secret prior art. However, the court may also use the language as an opportunity to coordinate the field.

The secret principles of the existing technology are rooted in important policy considerations: the inventor may keep the invention as a trade secret for long-term retention, and only when the competitor begins to uncover the secret to get the invention quickly, thus greatly extending the effective grant patent. In order to avoid this result, the United States of America No. 35 §102 provides that “[a] an individual is entitled to a patent unless the invention (b) the invention is publicly used or sold in the country for more than one year from the date of the patent application The

At the turn of the century, and explaining similar language, the Supreme Court considered the notorious case of the tights, Egbert v. Lippmann. An inventor gave a woman who later became his wife a new set of corsets or steel. Eight years later, he invited a friend to study the invention, so his wife “out, with a pair of corsets and a pair of scissors back, these corsets torn open, and out. ] Then explained how they were made and used. “Ten years later, the inventor applied for a patent.

The court has made a decision on the secret matter whether the sale, the gift, the knowledge or the use of the disclosure involves: “the inventor, giving or selling his equipment to another, being used by the insured or the defendant, unrestricted or Limited, or confidential, and so used, this use is public, even if the use and use of knowledge may be limited to one person.

The separation of the way from the thousands of years after the metalworking (metal 2) gift, disclosure and use of the case, the case of the appeal, elaborated on the basic facts (metallization 1). The inventors have discovered a new method of roughening a hard metal surface so that additional metal can be more closely integrated so that the mechanic can reconstruct the worn engine parts. In the first thirty months of applying for a patent, “he asked the advice of a friendly engineer, who told him that he would be thoroughly tested before attempting to obtain a patent.” In the first 29 months of submission, the inventor Commissioned a patent search. Twenty-three months before the submission, the inventor advertised in a trade magazine, announcing that he had a new hardened metallization process, despite no notice. The inventor also made a statement to the Executive Officer who provided him with a patent for the inventor and granted a patent license. “After thirty to twelve months, the inventor solicited and received sixty-six orders for the reconstruction of the part,” the practice of this process is so guarded, not openly aware; its nature is only to the employees of a few inventors and Consultants disclose that in all cases, in the case of distrust, not being abused. “The amount of uncertainty in the work is done at the expense of the inventor, and the other sales are the parties who know the” secret process. “An order for the first eight months of the patent application is to understand that the job is Experimental customer carried out.

Rely on Egbert, the Metallic Court 1 decided that the above sale and use were not open and therefore not a condition of patentability. “The inventor’s patent is the condition that, after preparing for the patent, he will not use his findings competitively; he must be in his own secret or” Legal monopoly. “However, for subsequent doctrinal consistency, the court has never determined which activities produced a patentable column. Perhaps the event that is defined is the discussion with the engineer or the ad. Perhaps this bar is triggered by the genius part, and perhaps only those who lead to the use of the inventor secret sales before getting the patent to get “competitive advantage over others”, although the metal 1 did not find out which sales might be, Did not provide factors to determine the competitive advantage.

Thirty years later, Hobbes v. American clarified that the general sale – regardless of purpose, confidentiality or the identity of the seller – produced 35U.SC Section 102 “Sale” patentable column, as long as the equipment was fully developed, patents and experiments The use has ended. However, it is determined whether the contract is and when to invent the “sale”, whether the inquiry or order is counted as sales, and whether the use of the experiment is over, and even in Hobbes there is no quick task.

The complexity soon hung up. Considering a few related doctrines, all of these are legally applicable laws: the sale itself may be experimental use, thus exempting Section 102 “sell” the patentability clause; the sale rights do not make the equipment “sold”; between legal entities The seller and the end user do not need to know or agree to sell; if no sample is provided to the customer, the entity may be in the presence of the product, and the seller may not be required to sell the goods; The “temporary” model presented to potential buyers may hinder patentability unless the details of the invention of the potential buyer are described as unsuitable prior to the sale of the agreement; similarly, the disposition of the origin of the income may No; the list of prices is sufficient to be invented; third-party experimental use may trigger a fatal bar, except under the supervision and control of the patent applicant.

Doctrine multiplication has a side effect: an independent inventor who seeks an investor or an independent inventor before seeking an investor or a client – itself is an increasingly expensive sport – is likely to be in conflict with at least one “sale” exception. Complex inventors and large innovative entities are better able to navigate these deceptive waters, and the courts must deal with strong de facto cases of specific sales and scattered in a better part of the century.

It may be appreciated that the United States Invention Act amended 35U.SC §102 and now states that “[a] an individual is entitled to a patent unless the claimed invention is publicly available, sold or otherwise obtained.” According to many readings, “Or publicly available” language has changed the “use” and “sales” provisions, eliminating the ability of secret prior art to form a patent. It remains to be seen whether the court will take such an analysis, since the patent submitted under the United States Invention Act is usually not yet released, let alone questioned in court.

However, in addition to the secret prioritized wholesale classification of the existing technology, if the “public use” is read into the “use” and “sales” terms, you can choose a choice: sales can simply be used with the current processing, gifts, and other disclosures The Article 102 of the Pre-Trial Law has been required, and the public can access the case for non-economic purposes (such as gifts or demonstrations) that meet the conditions of public use. Full secrets may prevent gifts, disclosures and use of the “pre-emptive rights” Article 102 “Public Use” column, just as the lack of safety makes the corset steel available to the public. In fact, the Federal Circuit may have been in this direction to the controversial “sale” situation.

At the Delano farm, after deciding on AIA, but explaining the patent application before the AIA and applying the former AIA law, the third party gets under the control of improved grape varieties under oral confidentiality conditions. However, the third party then handed the grape plant to the other two grape growers within four years. They all knew that the improved grapes were the main competitive advantage, all of which were planted on hundreds of places visible on public roads plant.

By most of the measures, if any of these transfers or activities are offered for sale, then they will make these plants not affected under the metallization. There is evidence that, as the lower court has pointed out, one of the third parties sold the other grapes and served as mentors and exchanged “grafts” between the two sides. The two sides may exchange the social or non-monetary benefits of the plant and may allocate plants to each other to understand the future sale of grapes. Test briefings and complaints vary, claiming that a third party has grafted grapes during normal business, and the patent is not valid under 35 U. S. C. Article 102 (b) – although it does not specify whether the plaintiff wishes to apply the “public use” or “sale” bar. If the harvest is good, as long as the conditional offer to sell grapes, and perhaps a few samples of grapes together, should be enough to quote.

But the gift is essentially selling the problem has not been resolved. On the contrary, the Federal Circuit in the “public use” principle to determine the problem, the application of “full secret” test is very reminiscent of Egbert and its descendants. The court cited factors such as the inability to identify grape varieties by simply looking at grapes, compared to the size of the site, the limited number of sown areas, the unqualified cultivation, and the fact that no other person recognized the evidence to test the breed, especially the third party Rattan test is confidential.

In function, the back of the AIA $ 102 ‘[open] sale of the bar’s application may look much like the Delano farm. The decision of the court will depend on whether the sale or offer is “publicly sold” – that is, the party that does not have sufficient confidentiality obligations and whether there is a public use. Under this system, a backyard inventor does not need to pass several rigorous restrictions on the sale of samples to find his patent invalid: at least if these secret sales did not cause new art, reverse engineering or more than one year before the public application patent application The Like secret use, secret sales may become publicly sold in the case of too much distribution.

It is important that, for the courts that hear such cases, records will be a public issue and a measure taken by the Parties for confidentiality. The court may turn to decide what kind of “restricted or restricted or confidential ban” is sufficient to prevent sales from becoming “provided to the public” rather than sorting old sales receipts and oral testimony.

Finally, the Delano farm should provide a pacification solution to the courts that are plagued by the potential impact of the US Department of Defense 35 U.C.C. Section 102 – Review of gifts based on more reasonable “public access” criteria, rather than metallized sales rules, did not lead to any terrible march. At least should provide and sell similar reviews should be worse.

Corset and Wines: Coordinated Secret Gifts and Secret Sales Secrets of Modern Art

The secret modern art doesctrine represents one of the more complex and conflicting areas of American patent law. In 1946, when the metallization project was decided and accelerated by Hobbes v. United States, the court had an impact on the effectiveness of sales, gifts, knowledge, public use, private use, advertising and sales patents in different ways, each Are dependent on a series of changes, corsets wholesale often a common series of factors, most of which is the US Patent and Trademark Office in the review of patent applications can not be assessed. The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and many patent attorneys agree that 35 U.S.C.’s new US Invention Act (AIA) Article 102 aims to completely eliminate the secret prior art. However, the court may also use the language as an opportunity to coordinate the field.

The secret principles of the existing technology are rooted in important policy considerations: the inventor may keep the invention as a trade secret for long-term retention, and only when the competitor begins to uncover the secret to get the invention quickly, thus greatly extending the effective grant patent. In order to avoid this result, the United States Former US No. 35 §102 provides that ” an individual is entitled to a patent unless the invention [b] is publicly used or sold in Date of application more than one year before the patent .

At the turn of the century, and explaining similar language, the Supreme Court considered the notorious case of the tights, Egbert v. Lippmann. An inventor gave a woman who later became his wife a new set of corsets or steel. Eight years later, he invited a friend to study the invention, so his wife “out, with a pair of corsets and a pair of scissors back, these corsets torn open, and out. ] Then explained how they were made and used. “Ten years later, the inventor applied for a patent.

The court has made a decision on the secret matter whether the sale, the gift, the knowledge or the use of the disclosure involves: “the inventor, giving or selling his equipment to another, being used by the insured or the defendant, unrestricted or Limited, or confidential, and so used, this use is public, even if the use and use of knowledge may be limited to one person.

The separation of the way from the thousands of years after the metalworking gift, disclosure and use of the case, the case of the appeal, elaborated on the basic facts . The inventors have discovered a new method of roughening a hard metal surface so that additional metal can be more closely integrated so that the mechanic can reconstruct the worn engine parts. In the first thirty months of applying for a patent, “he solicited the advice of a friendly engineer, who told him to thoroughly test the patent before the actual service.” In the first 29 months of the submission, the inventor commissioned Patent search. Twenty-three months before the submission, the inventor advertised in a trade magazine, announcing that he had a new hardened metallization process, despite no notice. The inventor also made a statement to the Executive Officer who provided him with a patent for the inventor and granted a patent license. “After thirty to twelve months, the inventor solicited and received sixty-six orders for the reconstruction of the part,” the practice of this process is so guarded, not openly aware; its nature is only to the employees of a few inventors and Consultants disclose that in all cases, in the case of distrust, not being abused. “The amount of uncertainty in the work is done at the expense of the inventor, and the other sales are the parties who know the” secret process. “An order for the first eight months of the patent application is to understand that the job is Experimental customer carried out.

Rely on Egbert, the Metallic Court 1 decided that the above sale and use were not open and therefore not a condition of patentability. “The inventor’s patent is the condition that, after preparing for the patent, he will not use his findings competitively; he must be in his own secret or” Legal monopoly. “However, for subsequent doctrinal consistency, the court has never determined which activities produced a patentable column. Perhaps the event that is defined is the discussion with the engineer or the ad. Perhaps this bar is triggered by the genius part, and perhaps only those who lead to the use of the inventor secret sales before getting the patent to get “competitive advantage over others”, although the metal 1 did not find out which sales might be, Did not provide factors to determine the competitive advantage.

Thirty years later, Hobbes v. American clarified that the general sale – regardless of purpose, confidentiality or the identity of the seller – produced 35U.SC Section 102 “Sale” patentable column, as long as the equipment was fully developed, patents and experiments The use has ended. However, it is determined whether the contract is and when to invent the “sale”, whether the inquiry or order is counted as sales, and whether the use of the experiment is over, and even in Hobbes there is no quick task.

The complexity soon hung up. Considering a few related doctrines, all of these are legally applicable laws: the sale itself may be experimental use, thus exempting Section 102 “sell” the patentability clause; the sale rights do not make the equipment “sold”; between legal entities The seller and the end user do not need to know or agree to sell; if no sample is provided to the customer, the entity may be in the presence of the product, and the seller may not be required to sell the goods; The “temporary” model presented to potential buyers may hinder patentability unless the details of the invention of the potential buyer are described as unsuitable prior to the sale of the agreement; similarly, the disposition of the origin of the income may No; the list of prices is sufficient to be invented; third-party experimental use may trigger a fatal bar, except under the supervision and control of the patent applicant.

Doctrine multiplication has a side effect: an independent inventor who seeks an investor or an independent inventor before seeking an investor or a client – itself is an increasingly expensive sport – is likely to be in conflict with at least one “sale” exception. Complex inventors and large innovative entities are better able to navigate these deceptive waters, and the courts must deal with strong de facto cases of specific sales and scattered in a better part of the century.

It may be appreciated that the United States Invention Act amended 35U.SC §102 and now states that ” an individual is entitled to a patent unless the claimed invention is publicly available, sold or otherwise obtained.” According to many readings, “Or publicly available” language has changed the “use” and “sales” provisions, eliminating the ability of secret prior art to form a patent. It remains to be seen whether the court will take such an analysis, since the patent submitted under the United States Invention Act is usually not yet released, let alone questioned in court.

However, in addition to the secret prioritized wholesale classification of the existing technology, if the “public use” is read into the “use” and “sales” terms, you can choose a choice: sales can simply be used with the current processing, gifts, and other disclosures The Article 102 of the Pre-Trial Law has been required, and the public can access the case for non-economic purposes (such as gifts or demonstrations) that meet the conditions of public use. Full secrets may prevent gifts, disclosures and use of the “pre-emptive rights” Article 102 “Public Use” column, just as the lack of safety makes the corset steel available to the public. In fact, the Federal Circuit may have been in this direction to the controversial “sale” situation.

At the Delano farm, after deciding on AIA, but explaining the patent application before the AIA and applying the former AIA law, the third party gets under the control of improved grape varieties under oral confidentiality conditions. However, the third party then handed the grape plant to the other two grape growers within four years. They all knew that the improved grapes were the main competitive advantage, all of which were planted on hundreds of places visible on public roads plant.

By most of the measures, if any of these transfers or activities are offered for sale, then they will make these plants not affected under the metallization. There is evidence that, as the lower court has pointed out, one of the third parties sold the other grapes and served as mentors and exchanged “grafts” between the two sides. The two sides may exchange the social or non-monetary benefits of the plant and may allocate plants to each other to understand the future sale of grapes. Test briefings and complaints vary, claiming that a third party has grafted grapes during normal business, and the patent is not valid under 35 U. S. C. Article 102 (b) – although it does not specify whether the plaintiff wishes to apply the “public use” or “sale” bar. If the harvest is good, as long as the conditional offer to sell grapes, and perhaps a few samples of grapes together, should be enough to quote.

But the gift is essentially selling the problem has not been resolved. On the contrary, the Federal Circuit in the “public use” principle to determine the problem, the application of “full secret” test is very reminiscent of Egbert and its descendants. The court cited factors such as the inability to identify grape varieties by simply looking at grapes, compared to the size of the site, the limited number of sown areas, the unqualified cultivation, and the fact that no other person recognized the evidence to test the breed, especially the third party Rattan test is confidential.

In function, the back of the AIA $ 102 ‘[open] sale of the bar’s application may look much like the Delano farm. The decision of the court will depend on whether the sale or offer is “publicly sold” – that is, the party that does not have sufficient confidentiality obligations and whether there is a public use. Under this system, a backyard inventor does not need to pass several rigorous restrictions on the sale of samples to find his patent invalid: at least if these secret sales did not cause new art, reverse engineering or more than one year before the public application patent application The Like secret use, secret sales may become publicly sold in the case of too much distribution.

It is important that, for the courts that hear such cases, records will be a public issue and a measure taken by the Parties for confidentiality. The court may turn to decide what kind of “restricted or restricted or confidential ban” is sufficient to prevent sales from becoming “provided to the public” rather than sorting old sales receipts and oral testimony.

Finally, the Delano farm should provide a pacification solution to the courts that are plagued by the potential impact of the US Department of Defense 35 U.C.C. Section 102 – Review of gifts based on more reasonable “public access” criteria, rather than metallized sales rules, did not lead to any terrible march. At least should provide and sell similar reviews should be worse.

Try to be so hard to be sexy to make you stupid

The Nairobi diary, contrary to the name may be, is not about the life of the slum youth struggling in the city day after day. If you ask me more about a group of women looking for attention, but I’d rather their concern is respectful because it is as expensive as ever and lasts longer.

I do not think they represent the values ​​of the majority of cheap sexy corsets women in Nairobi or Kenya. For beginners, just as Kenyan women already know that they have lost their heads in knitting and false stretching, the producers of this show may bring fresh air to some very beautiful life, some of the original elements – African beauty I am sure There are some amazing women in this city, they are free. Or are they looking for a particular type of woman who is represented by false eyelashes, pasting nails and other enhanced body parts? Come on, we only have so much, we can believe in a convincing doll look, or leave the model!

Sometimes the whole program is on an absurd boundary. For example, how do you call the nerves, as a self-esteem woman, bring a pair of boxers and boast of their foreign celebrities who belong to you overnight? true? The

There are more lives in the loud noise, sexy and party animals. Some of us are breeding on the third grade corn and fish, walking along the miles to the school and the river, spending the weekend in Sabah, climbing trees, raising cattle, and fighting the boys on the playground. Try to fight with us, you will know how to feel the truck is running!

Of course, not all of us are cut off for lawyers, journalists or doctors. I admit that some like the Nairobi diary, the right to choose to become a celebrity. To my surprise, they are willing to go to the camera to enter the degree of private life. When we ask for equality, how do we treat women seriously, but we can not even respect ourselves. Men do not do that, do you claim that women are marginalized? Oh puh-leeze!

Do not forget that your own way to be treated. So if your chest is always overflowing, you’ll be like a third-rate hip-hop artist cursed on cheap weeds and boast of men you sleep, guess we’ll think of you? In this case, do not try my nonsense even fly, because even in the market, you may be able to buy things according to their packaging. So what do you know about chicks? We have to judge your evil!

Fake foreign accents, designer clothes, expensive jewelery and expensive shoes will not let you grow old or “high end”. An elegant woman is an educated, independent thinking, compliment and future-oriented woman. She is a woman with character, morality and respect for her dignity. As long as she respects herself and her body, whether she is a mother or a cleaner, it does not matter. Now is class.

I was fired before, because they have more money, more attention, more beautiful than me, I hate other women. Yes yes yes! The weak always put the public opinion as bitter. To think about why I would hate those women who could hardly spell their names, more time to open their legs than their minds I only have a woman’s problem, do not know what dignity.

Women will not win the fight against chauvinism as long as they continue to wear obscene. Respect is won, not as it is. Learn to fight for yourself, no matter how many people you can take home. The value of honor more than material wealth, leaving a positive legacy. Look at the mirror, look at you, not around you, because here is the answer.
Google Translate for Business:Translator ToolkitWebsite Translator

LA SHOWROOM wholesale HALLOWEEN COSTUMES and fashion

Are you looking for the last moment wholesale sexy corsets ideas to sell in your store? After all, now we go into October, it is essentially the last phone to festive fashion for Halloween 2015 season to store your store! Whether you want a full set of multi-piece clothing, or simply use the relevant color and pattern of fashion, LA Showroom can help you. Do not delay – buy these works now to optimize your season for Halloween sales.

When Halloween costumes appear in your store, you do not have to consider top, very obvious or super creative. Simple accessories and blouses, such as the above items, have great sales potential. For those who want to vacation, but not very dressed, or in the environment can not use a complete clothing, such as Arden and Bear Dance such a supplier is a good place.

On the other hand, if you are looking for a Halloween costume concept that includes the entire nine yards, then we recommend a different set of suppliers. For the idea of ​​children’s Halloween costumes, let RainBow and Cinderella Fashion do something for you and give them a subcategory of “clothing”. As for adults, Donna Di Capri and Daisy Corsets all offer a range of different Halloween costumes from a more conservative and highly sexy.

Tights fashion return

When Miuccia Prada restates the fall corset, you know it’s time for the fashion debate now. She explains today’s clever thinking, rogue woman sports sailor hat, wearing elastic lace corset, with loop belt. Italian brands are displayed in white, as well as denim and knitwear. However, in this picnic, tights mean support rather than lustful.

In the Balmain (Balmain) exhibition of the big story (of course, Kendall / Jijie hair exchange except) designer Olivier Rustin (Olivier Rousteing) unique use of niche technology, brought out a series of emphasis Shape and proportion of the pieces. In the crotch controversy in the early twentieth century when the change, fashion back to reminiscent of the empire outline style. Paul Poiret is the leader of the sport. He replaced the corset with a soft skirt, and the skirt was similarly restricted, so it was easy to corsets wholesale be used in an era of desire for change.

Other designers, such as Madeleine Vionnet, Mariano Fortuny and Coco Chanel, followed by a comfortable style. We talked with the designer about the arrival of corset fashion

This is about making a statement
Designers Dina (Rina Dhaka) said: “Balmain has always been an avant-garde, rocky fashion aesthetics in the modern environment, tights means to carry your brand knowledge, to create their own stories.Of course, corset is Uncomfortable, your blood is crowded, but with the use of technology more and more, social media updates, more and more objective.

Male band
Designer Rocky Star sees the return of corset as a new sensual wave. “The trend of corset is released in modern women, because the waistline is the most important attraction of the body, making it more emotional and confidence-building.From the designer’s point of view, the style comes from the Victorian era, from that era Some women screamed for oppression – she chose to wear corset, but I focus on the positive side.

He added, “I simply can not find the limit, in fact I will take the liberty to say, to solve the life she wants!”

Adjust the curve
Designer Purvi Doshi that there are different types of corset is returning. However, there are some inspiration from the corset design, and designers are so designed. Corset new version of the corset is back to the fashion industry. Tighten the body of the corset. The corset strengthens the curve, bringing out the feminine nuances, which is a very free concept. I personally prefer free-flowing or layered design, but I like the senior designer how to try corset, “she said.

Designers two Hemant and Nandita said: “Corset has a long history, corset reasons (to reduce the waist circumference.) Has been convinced that simple, comfortable, ready to wear mantra designers will always adhere to this, That ‘s the concept of fashion that resonates with us or what we agree with.

Fashion is cyclical
Hemant added: “With the changing and repetition of the fashion cycle, fashion trends are always returning, but with the challenge is always changing the trend of fashion, so we can always get inspiration from the corset, while adding us Interested in the details of modern silhouette. Can be creative way into the lace and blend.

How to Deal with Corset Modesty Panels

Struggling with your modesty panel every time you lace up? Worry not, there’s a solution! Read ahead to learn about the 3 most common types of modesty panels in corsets – and how to keep them straight and centered while you’re lacing up. If you don’t like to use modesty panels, most types are completely removable, and panels are usually not required in the first place.

  

Stiffened, detached modesty panels (Dark Garden) You can choose to use it or not use it depending on your preference. If you’re wearing a silky shirt, this panel wants to slide off your back before you even wrap your corset around yourself! There are a couple of ways I get around this. Method 1: Bend forward a bit, so you can balance the panel on your back. Hold the panel in place with one hand while you wrap the corset around yourself with the other hand. Don’t worry if it’s uneven at this point. Do up the busk.

The laces and very slight tension at this point should keep the panel from falling. Look in the mirror and adjust the position of the panel so it’s centered, not tilted, and the top and bottom edges match up with the corset properly. This is best done when you’re half-finished lacing your corset (if you try to adjust it when you’re finished lacing up, there may be too much tension for you to adjust the panel easily. Method 2: Put your corset on and do up the busk. Do not tighten the laces yet – in fact, it’s a good idea to loosen the laces even more than you usually would (if possible). Lean over slightly and slide the panel under the corset at the SIDE (if you try to do it at the back, the panel is highly likely to get tangled in the laces).

Once the panel is in place vertically, then slide the panel to the back and center it on your back. It should not get tangled in the laces this way. Give a tug on the laces to provide enough tension to keep the panel in place. When you’re halfway done tightening up the corset, check one last time that your panel is placed where you want it, then finish up lacing. Unstiffened modesty panels, stitched to the side (most OTR corsets) This is the most popular style of modesty panel – usually a couple of layers of fabric, fastened to one side of the corset. Keep in mind, the following steps work if the modesty panel is sewn to the left side (like Orchard Corset). If your corset has the panel sewn to the right side (like What Katie Did, Corset Story, etc.), you’ll need to do these steps in mirror image. Hold the corset in your left hand and lean to the right. As you swing the corset around your back and catching the other side in your right hand, gravity will help the panel flop towards the laces and flatten across your back.

Wrap the corset around your body and fasten the busk. Look in the mirror. Ensure your modesty panel is flat. Tug the laces at the waistline. If your panel starts to crinkle or fold on itself. Then use your right hand to reach around your back, and grab the panel to pull it flat. Lace up your corset a little more, stopping periodically to pull and tuck the modesty panel flat again and again. Is this a pain in the butt? Yes, but there’s really no way around it (unless you want to modify the panel). Don’t expect the panel to be perfectly smooth the way the rest of your corset is.

A vertical or crease fold over your spine is perfectly normal! In a previous video I showed how to take an unstiffened modesty panel, detach it, add a stiffener (using either bones or canvas) and suspend it on the laces using grommets (some prefer to use ribbons to suspend it instead, which is also gorgeous). Here’s how I made my own modesty panel for a corset using canvas. N.B. some types of modesty panels (like What Katie Did) are sewn into the lining of the corset such that the panel cannot be removed using a seam ripper without compromising the integrity of the corset. In such cases, if you want to completely remove the modesty panel, it’s best to simply cut the panel out while keeping the stitching undisturbed.

Stiffened, suspended (floating) modesty panels (Retrofolie) This is a stiffened rectangle very much like Dark Garden’s modesty panel (the first type) except it’s suspended on the laces. Here’s how to lace up with one of these: When I initially wrap the corset around my body, I try NOT to lean too much to one side or the other – this helps keep the panel from sliding horizontally on the laces, and minimizes my work to adjust its position later on. Fasten the busk. Adjust the panel so that it’s not tilted, and the top and bottom edges of the panel is level with the top and bottom of the corset.

Notice in the video that I have to make relatively few adjustments with this panel (it stays nicely in place and doesn’t crinkle too badly). This why this type of modesty panel is my personal favorite! The only disadvantage is that if you want to change your corset laces (or remove the panel) it’s quite time-consuming to unlace and relace. However, some modesty panels have easily-removable velcro tabs which fasten quickly and easily to suspend itself on the laces, and can be removed just as easily! Find them here in my shop.