The History Of Corsets Is More Complicated Than You Probably Think
Khloe Kardashian / Instagram
Every morning, before wearing work clothes, Sarah Woodyard put on a corset. As Milliner and Mantua-Maker in Colonial Williamsburg, wearing a historically accurate corset is part of Woodyard’s work, where she spends a day educating visitors about the life of the American colonies. The corset she wore was different: on some days, she wore an 18th-century accommodation; on other people, she chose a cordless corset about 1800. Either way, the corset is an important part of her work uniform. Although Woodyard can be on cotton metal or bone for up to 18 hours, she didn’t complain: “[Wearing a corset] is like you are gently holding and hugging for a whole day,” Woodyard told me. .
The corset is one of the most misunderstood costumes in fashion history. For fashion revisionists, this is a simple goal: to remove from the once decorated body, the stiff structure of the corset, and the unforgivable grill skeleton, which looks like a medieval torture device: rough But effective.
“It’s going to be a terrible thing to wear it every day. It’s like living in a cage,” says Zoe Helen, the cultural activist and founder of the cosmic sister. She is a female collective that promotes gender equality. . “[The corset] is definitely a return for women. There is no doubt in my mind, if you have doubts, you have not worn enough time,” Hailin said.
But according to Woodyard, a person wearing a corset, most of the time, a corset all day is supportive, allowing women to perform housework without back pain. “I found that they often helped my day. And the back support really helped me without pain at the end of the day. I did the laundry and cooking in the eighteenth century. When you had to pick up a heavy bucket, or bend And when moving heavy objects [support of the corset] is really helpful, “Woodyard told me.
But is the corset not very uncomfortable or even painful, and the squeezing organs will be forgotten? “I don’t think many people realize that the 18th century manufacturers… [make women] a person who is suitable for [their customers] and is very suitable for them,” Ms. Woodyard said. . “So I often fit the tight words and should install the pillars, but they shouldn’t be tight. If they are too tight, then you need to fix them.”
When the extreme version of the garment dominates our understanding of the corset, it is easy to fall in love with the corset, which is the subsequent evolution. When our understanding of historical dress is rooted in books or museum exhibits, they are removed from the person wearing them, and the bodice looks like an abstract torture device. However, like all clothes, it is a living, so it is not a consistent static image; instead, it is a clothing suitable for the wearer – choose the person who wears it.